Municipal 2012 Budget

The Socialist Party of Mojacar warns that the budget that the government team has approved for 2012 is "unsustainable"

 The Socialist Party of Mojacar warns that the 2012 budget that the government team has led in the last Plenary Session is "unsustainable"
Socialist spokesman maintains that this continues, the Town Hall can not guarantee economic stability and employment of their workers

The Municipal Socialist Group in the city of Mojacar has warned that the municipal budget presented by the government team is "simply unsustainable" and that the estimate of revenue and expenses "some 12 million euros respectively, is only a theory that is removed when you study the details. "

Socialist spokesman, Manuel Zamora, explained that the settlement of 2010 "shows that the cases are left to raise revenue more than 40%, for various causes," so that "as a result, we went down to a availability of 6 million per year to ensure all payments. "

Zamora has also noted that "the accumulated debts with banks and suppliers as Nila and Urbaser and amounting to more than 6 million euros, 544,000 euros with their interest for non-payment or delay that the judge has ruled,and the mayoress tries to hide."

For the Socialist spokesman is "clear that the accounts do not go", so he has expressed his doubts about the possibility of "ensuring economic stability and employment of local workers." "We are concerned that they can charge today, but also within five years," he said, "and the truth is that the poor tax collection, increased personal and interest expenses, the City is not only taking a few or no investment, but that is difficult to maintain economic normality, being able to utter ruin. "

Socialist Party spokesman has also highlighted the contradictions in which incurred the mayoress of Mojacar, who "increased her remuneration in 42%, at the very beginning of her term, but has rejected the motion tabled by the PSOE in the calling for a reduction of 20% in the Property Tax (IBI). " For Zamora, the decision "only serves the interests of the first mayoress to have money to pay her campaign pledges, albeit at the expense of overall benefit."